About POP!

POP! is INQUIRER.net’s premier pop culture channel, delivering the latest news in the realm of pop culture, internet culture, social issues, and everything fun, weird, and wired. It is also home to POP! Sessions and POP! Hangout,
OG online entertainment programs in the
Philippines (streaming since 2015).

As the go-to destination for all things ‘in the now’, POP! features and curates the best relevant content for its young audience. It is also a strong advocate of fairness and truth in storytelling.

POP! is operated by INQUIRER.net’s award-winning native advertising team, BrandRoom.

Contact Us

Email us at [email protected]


MRP Building, Mola Corner Pasong Tirad Streets, Brgy La Paz, Makati City

Girl in a jacket

Do we really need the ‘Heterosexual Act’? Or is it another ploy to invalidate the LGBTQ Community?

A district representative from Manila recently filed a bill that aims to recognize, define, and protect the rights of heterosexuals, which seems to counter the controversial ‘SOGIE’ Bill which, ironically, also covers the rights of our hetero bros and sis. 6th District Rep. Bienvenido Abante Jr. filed House Bill No. 5717 or ‘Heterosexual bill,’ which seeks to “protect”straight people from “oppression” they apparently suffer.

Per INQUIRER.net’s report, Abante’s proposed law aims to protect the following rights of ‘Heterosexuals’:

  • To adhere to, practice, proclaim, promote, propagate, defend and protect their religion and religious beliefs, convictions and standards without interference and/or abridgment
  • To practice and enjoy their religious profession and worship without interference or abridgment with the right to exclude therefrom others of different beliefs or faith
  • To freely express and communicate with others, privately or publicly, verbally or in writing or through print or broadcast media or through social media platforms that now exist or that may hereafter be developed
  • To freely express, exercise, and impose, in running or operating their churches, businesses, schools or workplaces
  • To freely express their views, verbally or in writing, privately or publicly, in print or broadcast media, or in social media platforms that now exist or may hereafter be developed about homosexuality, bisexuality, and on transgenders and queers according to their religious beliefs and practices and to biblical principles and standards.

The proposed legislation likewise deems these acts as prohibited:

  • Preventing, prohibiting, abridging, or otherwise interfering with the free exercise and enjoyment by heterosexuals of any of their rights
  • Attempting to prohibit, abridge, or otherwise interfere with the free exercise and enjoyment by heterosexuals of any of their rights
  • Threatening, directly or indirectly, in any form, a homosexual for exercising any of his or her rights

If these are violated, the bill recommends penalties of imprisonment from five years and one day to seven years and one day, as well as fines ranging from P100,000 to P200,000.

Understandably, the bill has received backlash from people. Here are some of their reactions online:


Heterosexuals are also included in the ‘SOGIE’ Bill

One misconception about the SOGIE Bill is that it only caters to those who are not straight. But, it doesn’t. 

Heterosexual Act
via Twitter
Heterosexual Act
via Twitter
Heterosexual Act
via Twitter

Twitter users pointed out that the SOGIE Equality Bill encompasses all gender and sexual orientations and proposing a bill that only targets one gender is absurd. 


Heterosexuals aren’t oppresed 

Another argument people online use on why the Heterosexual act is not needed is because, ‘Heteros’ are already protected in the current system.

Heterosexual Act
via Twitter
Heterosexual Act
via Twitter


Some say that this act is just making up problems suffered by the ‘Heteros’.

Heterosexual Act
via Facebook

They questioned the premise of the bill that assumes that heterosexuals experienced prejudice and judgment from society. But for some, it mocks the advocacy for gender equality

via Twitter


An excuse to discriminate the LGBTQIA Community 

In section four (4) of the bill, it states that Heterosexuals should be ‘free’ in expressing their views in any way they can about the Homosexuals, Bisexuals, Transgenders and queers. That is according to their religious beliefs and practices and biblical principles and standards.

This triggered a lot of people as this can encourage others to further discriminate the LGBTQIA Community 

via Twitter

(Disclaimer: The proposed bill has not not yet been signed into law)

Human rights lawyer Chel Diokno also gave his opinion regarding the matter. He said in his tweet that the bill legalizes the denial of human rights to the members of the LGBTQIA. He also argued that no matter how different our belief is, the proposed act is wrong and that SOGIE is the better bill to be signed into law.  

Abante also says in his bill that heterosexuals are ‘direct and actual creation of God’ which were called out by many as an attack to other genders

Heterosexual Act
via Twitter



However, the Philippine Social Conservative Movement  applauds the said bill as it counters the ‘repressive effects’ of SOGIE on Freedom of Religion and Expression 

via Facebook
via Facebook

However, Sen. Risa Hontiveros said in her tweet three years ago that the SOGIE will not penalize people who will practice religious or academic freedom. 

And it will not dictate churches on their teachings or hiring process. 

So…do we really need it? 

Many people have called the heterosexual act a ‘joke of a law’ and that SOGIE Equality Bill is actually better as covers everyone in the spectrum, including the heterosexuals.


Other POP! stories you might like:

What’s the deal with ‘Mx.’ and why are people using it?

A twisted perception of the LGBTQIA+ community still permeates in our films and movies

Putting the ‘B’ in LGBTQIA+: What it means to be bisexual in the Philippines


Subscribe to our daily newsletter

[forminator_form id="331316"]

Related Stories

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Popping on POP!