About POP!

POP! is INQUIRER.net’s premier pop culture channel, delivering the latest news in the realm of pop culture, internet culture, social issues, and everything fun, weird, and wired. It is also home to POP! Sessions and POP! Hangout,
OG online entertainment programs in the
Philippines (streaming since 2015).

As the go-to destination for all things ‘in the now’, POP! features and curates the best relevant content for its young audience. It is also a strong advocate of fairness and truth in storytelling.

POP! is operated by INQUIRER.net’s award-winning native advertising team, BrandRoom.

Contact Us

Email us at [email protected]

Address

MRP Building, Mola Corner Pasong Tirad Streets, Brgy La Paz, Makati City

Girl in a jacket

X (Twitter) user reveals many researchers used AI to co-author published research papers

The academic publishing industry may need to peer-review their own regulations in light of this revelation. While AI can be used to detect plagiarism and look out for any forms of data fabrication, AI-based technologies are also being used by researchers to write research entries in their behalf, which then make its way into appearing in reputable journals, which is now putting their credibility in question.

In an X (Twitter) thread created by a user named @itsandrewgao on August 10th, it was revealed that certain scientific research papers from diverse interdisciplinary fields, which had been published in peer-reviewed journals, were co-written by AI, which @itsandrewgao had scoured through numerous academic database. The authors of the papers have left behind entries by a key “co-author”–an AI, which almost always indicates itself with the line “as an AI language model.”

According to the source, these research papers can be found in the areas of commerce, environment, humanities, robots, diplomacy, among others. Many were surprised that these papers were actually approved by peer reviewers of the said journals.

tweet
via Twitter
tweet
via Twitter
tweet
via Twitter
tweet
via Twitter
tweet
via Twitter

 

While many were shocked, some claimed that these journals aren’t exactly the standard for peer-review, and that they could be fake and predatory.

tweet
via Twitter
tweet
via Twitter
tweet
via Twitter

However, one of them is proven to be under ElsevierConnect, a Scopus-indexed journal that has been serving the global research community since 2000 with about 99% of the Nobel Laureates in Science.

Now that there’s an increasing threat in terms of ethics and accuracy of scholarly literature, managers of other journals are eyeing the policy of asking authors to disclose their use of generative artificial intelligence. Several journals such as Nature and all Springer Nature journals, Committee on Publication Ethics, and the JAMA Network are banning AI language models or ChatGPT as the co-author.

In January, the Stanford University team created the algorithm known as “DetectGPT” to predict the likelihood of a sample generated from computer systems. Yet, this needs more enhancement in the future before building up robust results.

 

Other POP! stories that you might like:

‘Full-on crisis mode’: College professors are looking for ways to prevent students from cheating using ChatGPT

‘Job or Task Scam’: Don’t fall prey to this Ponzi-style scheme

First-time parents file lawsuit against doctor and hospital after their baby reportedly gets decapitated during delivery

‘Literature: Taylor’s Version’: Belgian University to introduce a Taylor Swift-inspired literature course

Paramore calls off remaining North American tour dates because of Hayley Williams’ lung infection

Tags:
About Author

Related Stories

Popping on POP!