The recent controversy surrounding the University of Santo Tomas (UST) and its Office for Student Affairs (OSA) has sparked intense public discourse. The incident involves the censorship of a photo by the campus media organization TomasinoWeb, depicting students from the College of Information and Computing Sciences (CICS) in Type B uniforms resembling those worn by convenience store employees.
The public’s strong reaction to the UST OSA controversy raises questions about the limits of freedom of expression within an academic setting. TomasinoWeb, as a campus media organization, plays a vital role in reflecting the diverse perspectives and experiences of the student body. The censorship of a seemingly innocuous photo has led to accusations of curbing press freedom, which is a fundamental tenet of any academic institution.
UST’s dismissal of the public backlash warrants scrutiny. The administration’s decision to order the removal of the photo, citing concerns of public ridicule, seems to dismiss the importance of open dialogue and the free exchange of ideas within a university setting. It is essential to explore whether such dismissive responses align with the institution’s commitment to fostering an environment that values critical thinking and diverse opinions.
The involvement of the OSA in issuing directives to TomasinoWeb adds complexity to the situation. While the OSA’s mandate is to oversee student affairs, questions arise regarding the extent of its involvement in editorial decisions made by student publications. The recurrent suppression of TomasinoWeb, as indicated by the resignation of its adviser, raises concerns about censorship and the interference of external forces in media organizations’ autonomy.
The Campus Journalism Act of 1991 defines the autonomy of student publications, emphasizing their independence from external influences. The application of this law and its technicalities in the UST context requires careful examination. The ethical implications of suppressing student journalists’ work need to be assessed, considering the potential impact on the institution’s reputation and its adherence to principles of transparency and accountability.
The National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) has criticized UST’s administration, labeling its reaction as “elitist.” This critique underscores broader concerns about the protection of press freedom within academic institutions. The elitist stance allegedly exhibited by UST may undermine the principles of inclusivity and openness that are integral to a university’s mission.
The threat of non-accreditation issued by the OSA to TomasinoWeb raises questions about the broader implications for student organizations within UST. The potential chilling effect on the freedom of expression among student groups and the fear of institutional repercussions may hinder the vibrant exchange of ideas that universities should foster.
The resignation of TomasinoWeb’s adviser and expressions of solidarity from faculty and student organizations highlight a growing concern within the UST community. The demonstration of solidarity emphasizes the need for open communication and collaboration between faculty, administration, and students to address issues of press freedom and censorship.
ADVISORY: In view of the resignation of our organization adviser, and following the protocol of the Office for Student Affairs, our publication on ALL social media platforms will be on hold until further notice. pic.twitter.com/XNDeDBUKPt
— TomasinoWeb (@TomasinoWeb) February 19, 2024
This incident is not just about a photo; it reflects a deeper societal issue. The decision to remove the photo suggests an elitist perspective, implying that being associated with convenience store workers—people performing honest and essential work—is somehow demeaning or a source of ridicule. This perspective is problematic as it perpetuates classist attitudes and fails to respect all forms of work.
On the other hand, academic freedom is a cornerstone of any educational institution, allowing for the free exchange of ideas, critical thinking, and the advancement of knowledge. It is a principle that should be upheld to ensure the intellectual growth of students and faculty alike. In this context, the UST administration’s decision to intervene in TomasinoWeb’s editorial decisions can be seen as a potential infringement on academic freedom. The administration’s action attempts to control the narrative and suppress student voices, which goes against the spirit of academic freedom.
The dismissal of the backlash by UST raises questions about the validity of public reactions. Are these reactions merely overreactions, or are they valid expressions of concern over an elitist perspective? This leads people to a mind-boggling question: Was it right for UST to dismiss the backlash, or were the people’s reactions valid?
In a society that values equality and respect for all, such incidents serve as a stark reminder of the deep-seated biases and prejudices that still exist. It is high time that we critically examine these incidents and the reactions they elicit, for they hold a mirror to the society we live in. In doing so, we can move towards a more inclusive and respectful society.
Other POP! stories that you might like:
Filipino on FB points out discrepancies in claim of ‘oldest mambabatok’ for Apo Whang-Od
Iconic Filipino drag queen Taylor Sheesh brings Eras Tour recreation to a global scale
‘Duck craze era’: Filipinos spice up OOTDs with little duck hair clips
You’re not imagining it: Some OPM songs are really disappearing from TikTok videos
What’s the English of ‘bayad po?’: Filipino shares hilarious foreigner encounter on TikTok
