About POP!

POP! is INQUIRER.net’s premier pop culture channel, delivering the latest news in the realm of pop culture, internet culture, social issues, and everything fun, weird, and wired. It is also home to POP! Sessions and POP! Hangout,
OG online entertainment programs in the
Philippines (streaming since 2015).

As the go-to destination for all things ‘in the now’, POP! features and curates the best relevant content for its young audience. It is also a strong advocate of fairness and truth in storytelling.

POP! is operated by INQUIRER.net’s award-winning native advertising team, BrandRoom.

Contact Us

Email us at [email protected]

Address

MRP Building, Mola Corner Pasong Tirad Streets, Brgy La Paz, Makati City

Girl in a jacket

Blake Lively faces another US$7 million defamation lawsuit from a PR crisis firm

Another lawsuit is running after ‘It Ends With Us’ star Blake Lively after she was sued for defamation by a crisis PR firm whom she had accused in a complaint she previously filed against her co-star and the film’s director, Justine Baldoni.

Jed Wallace from Street Relations, Inc., a crisis management company, filed the lawsuit on February 5. Wallace’s claim stemmed from Lively’s complaint to the California Civil Rights Department back in December where the actress alleged that Baldoni’s PR team hired Wallace to trigger a smear campaign against her. Lively’s claim stated that Wallace, “weaponized a digital army around the country from New York to Los Angeles to create, seed, and promote content that appeared to be authentic on social media platforms and internet chat forums.”

Blake Lively faces another US$7 million defamation lawsuit from a PR crisis firm

Apart from Lively’s civil rights complaint, Wallace also divulged that the lawsuit was a corollary from when the actress submitted a petition last January 21 asking for a deposition from Wallace, which was eventually withdrawn on February 4.

Wallace asserted that he had “nothing to do” with Lively’s accusation regarding the smear campaign. As a result, Wallace and the PR company claimed a minimum of 7 million dollars or 406 million pesos in damages, paired with “a court order stating that he didn’t engage in harassment or retaliation against the actress.”

The camp of Wallace maintained their position that Lively had no factual grounds with the allegations she hurled toward Wallace and Street Relations. Wallace also claimed that he suffered reputational harm upon the disclosure of his name in Lively’s complaint and court order even though he did not commit any retaliation or harassment against the actress.

Following the legal battle Wallace’s team had put forward, Lively’s camp released an official statement, “Another day, another state, another nine-figure lawsuit seeking to sue Ms. Lively ‘into oblivion’ for speaking out against harassment and retaliation.” Lively’s legal team was confident that the lawsuit would be dismissed and Wallace to be accountable in federal court after he “finally emerged from the shadows.”

Wallace’s recent lawsuit marked the fifth case entangled within the messy legal battle between Lively and Baldoni since December of 2024 wherein the conflict was ignited when Lively filed a sexual harassment case against Baldoni.

 

Other POP! stories you might like:

Justin Baldoni releases new behind-the-scene clips to ‘refute’ Blake Lively’s claims

K-pop star Ok Taecyon’s viral engagement debunked by his agency

Cristine Reyes’ Facebook post blends grief and celebration, leaves the internet confused

Lola Amour’s ‘Maria’ marks key milestone in band’s international journey with Australian artist Oliver Cronin

67th Grammy Awards marks milestones and memorable moments

Tags:

Related Stories

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Popping on POP!